Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 18026

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2024 | Month : February | Volume : 18 | Issue : 2 | Page : SC06 - SC10 Full Version

Microbial Profile and Antibiotic Sensitivity Pattern in Urinary Tract Infections among Children Attending a Tertiary Care Center, Idukki District, Kerala: A Cross-sectional Study


Published: February 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/64216.19034
Mariya Biju, Angel Cham Philip, Gulsiv Nair

1. Junior Resident, Department of Paediatrics, Al Azhar Medical College and Super Specialty Hospital, Thodupuzha, Kerala, India. 2. Assistant Professor, Department of Paediatrics, Al Azhar Medical College and Super Specialty Hospital, Thodupuzha, Kerala, India. 3. Associate Professor, Department of Microbiology, Al Azhar Medical College and Super Specialty Hospital, Thodupuzha, Kerala, India.

Correspondence Address :
Angel Cham Philip,
Assistant Professor, Department of Paediatrics, Al Azhar Medical College and Super Specialty Hospital, Thodupuzha-685605, Kerala, India.
E-mail: entaamc1@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Over the recent decades, the importance of Urinary Tract Infections (UTI) has been increasingly recognised in children. The occurrence of UTI during childhood may lead to acute and/or chronic consequences, such as impaired renal function, renal scarring, and hypertension. Due to the irrational use of antimicrobials, multidrug resistant bacterial strains are frequent. Hence, there is an urgent need for continuous surveillance of the microbiological profile of UTI.

Aim: To investigate the microbial profile and antibiotic sensitivity pattern from the urine of paediatric patients suspected to have UTI in Idukki district, Kerala and to explore its association with seasonal variations.

Materials and Methods: This clinical cross-sectional study was conducted in Al Azhar Medical College and Super Specialty Hospital, Thodupuzha, Idukki, Kerala, India, from January 2019 to December 2021. The study involved 882 paediatric patients in the age group 0-15 years with symptoms and signs suggestive of UTI. Data regarding age, gender, season, laboratory and culture results, and antibiotic sensitivity pattern were considered as variables of interest. Analysis was performed using mean and standard deviation for quantitative variables, and frequency and proportion for categorical variables. The statistical analyses were conducted using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20.0 and Microsoft Excel 2010.

Results: The study involved 882 patients, of which 399 were males (45.2%) and 483 were females (54.8%) with a male-to-female ratio of 0.8:1. The mean age of patients was four years, and a peak incidence was observed in children in the age group of 1-3 years, with 333 (37.8%) children. Microbial growth was observed in the urine of 325 (36.8%) patients. After excluding normal commensal perineal flora and insignificant bacteriuria, 233 samples had significant growth, with males accounting for 106 (45.5%) and females 127 (54.5%). The male-to-female ratio was 0.8 to 1. These samples mostly exhibited growth of aerobic bacteria (232, 99.6%) and Candida albicans (1, 0.4%). E. coli (106, 45.5%) was identified as the most predominant aetiological agent for paediatric UTI.

Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that it would be advisable for paediatricians in Idukki district to refrain from using Ampicillin to treat cases suspected to have UTI. Preventive measures should be advised to all patients, with emphasis on urinary hygiene during the monsoon and winter seasons.

Keywords

Antimicrobial, Escherichia coli, Multidrug resistant, Paediatric, Staphylococcus aureus

The UTI is one of the most common infections among children. The risk of developing a UTI in childhood is approximately 1-3% in boys and 3-10% in girls (1). UTI is defined as the growth of a significant number of organisms, i.e., more than 100,000 Colony-Forming Units (CFU)/mL of a single species in the urine sample in the presence of symptoms (2),(3). Timely and effective management of UTI with appropriate antibiotic administration is of immense importance to reduce the risk of long-term consequences in children (4).

A diagnosis of UTI is usually missed in infants and young children, as urinary symptoms are minimal and often non-specific in this age group. In children less than two years old, UTI is an important cause for fever without a focus. In neonates, it is usually a part of septicemia and can present with symptoms of fever, vomiting, lethargy, jaundice, and seizures. The typical presenting features in infants and young children include repeated fever, abdominal discomfort and pain, poor weight gain, and frequently, vomiting and diarrhoea. Among older children, the characteristic presenting features include dysuria, frequency, urgency, fever, and abdominal or flank pain. Adolescents may have symptoms restricted to the lower tract, and fever may not be present (2).

Previous similar studies from Kerala have described the microbial profile and pattern of antibiotic susceptibility from the northern, western, and eastern parts of Kerala (5),(6),(7). However, there is a need to determine whether empirical antibiotics that are being prescribed by paediatricians in Idukki district for paediatric UTI as part of standard practice are still relevant in the era of increasing antibiotic resistance and effective for this condition or are contributing to greater antibiotic resistance in the region. Additionally, there is currently no literature from Idukki district providing information on the microbial profile of UTI and any correlation with seasonal variations. Thus, this study will help guide clinicians in this geographical area towards more effective prescription of antibiotics and will also fill the remaining gaps in microbiological data from the central part of Kerala.

Hence, this study was conducted to determine the microbial profile and antibiotic sensitivity pattern in UTI from the urine of paediatric patients suspected to have UTI in Idukki district, Kerala, and also to find its correlation with seasonal variations.

Material and Methods

This clinical cross-sectional study was conducted from January 2019 to December 2021 at Al Azhar Medical College and Super Specialty Hospital, Thodupuzha, a tertiary care teaching hospital in Idukki district. The study was approved by the Institutional Ethical Committee (IEC No: AAMC/IEC/2018-2019/10). Informed consent was obtained from the parents or guardians of all patients before enrolling them in the study. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Inclusion criteria: The study included 882 paediatric patients in the age group 0-15 years in the department of paediatrics with symptoms and signs suggestive of UTI (2) and had pyuria in the urine microscopy as per the Indian Society of Paediatric Nephrology Guidelines 2011 (8). Only the samples which showed significant monobacterial growth (>105 CFU/mL) were confirmed as the UTI cases (8),(9). Only a single positive culture per patient was included in the analysis.

Exclusion criteria: Patients who were on any antibiotics (either oral or systemic) in the previous five days before presentation were excluded from the study.

A total of 882 samples, who presented in the Department of Paediatrics with symptoms and signs suggestive of UTI within the study duration, were enrolled in the study by convenience sampling.

Procedure

Data collection: Age, gender, seasonal variations, laboratory and culture results, and antibiotic sensitivity patterns were considered as variables of interest. Occurrence of seasonal variation of UTI with the prevalent seasons in Idukki district was also assessed. Urine samples (at least 10 mL) were obtained by either of the following methods: midstream clean catch, bladder catheterisation, or suprapubic aspiration. The collected specimens were transported immediately to the microbiology laboratory for further processing.

All samples were observed under the microscope for pyuria and were cultured on blood agar and MacConkey agar by the semi-quantitative method by streaking using a sterile calibrated wire loop and incubated aerobically for 18-24 hours at 35-37°C. Isolation and identification were done based on their morphology in Gram staining, cultural characteristics, and biochemical reactions (3),(10). Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (AST) was performed using the Kirby Bauer disk diffusion method as described by the Clinical Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI) guidelines- 2012 (11),(12).

According to the Kerala Meteorological Department (13), the seasons in Idukki are divided into three: summer (March-May), monsoon (June-October), and winter (November-February).

Statistical Analysis

All collected data were analysed and stored in a Microsoft Excel sheet. The analysis of all the parameters was done using mean and standard deviation for quantitative variables, and frequency and proportion for categorical variables. The statistical analyses were performed using Statistical Package for Social Science software SPSS version 20.0, (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) and Microsoft Excel 2010.

Results

This was a prospective observational study involving 882 paediatric patients, conducted in a tertiary care teaching hospital in Idukki, Kerala. Out of these, 399 were males (45.2%) and 483 were females (54.8%) with a male: female ratio of 0.8:1. The mean age of patients was 3.45±1.25 years, and the peak age group for whom urine samples were sent for culture were children in the age group of 1-3 years {333 (37.8%)}.

Microbial growth was seen in the urine of 325 (36.8%). After excluding normal commensal perineal flora and insignificant bacteriuria among 92 subjects, 233 patient samples were taken-up for the study. Of these, males were 106 (45.5%), and females 127 (54.5%) {(male:female ratio of 0.8 to 1)}. Infants accounted for 100 cases (42.9%), 107 (45.9%) cases in the age group 1-5 years, 23 (9.9%) cases from the ages 6-10 years, and 3 cases (1.3%) were from older children (Table/Fig 1).

Out of the total 233, the specimens grew mostly aerobic and facultatively anaerobic bacteria {232 (99.6%)}, and fungi {1 (0.4%)}. E. coli {106 (45.5%)} was identified as the most predominant aetiological agent for paediatric UTI. This was followed by Staphylococcus aureus (considering both methicillin-resistant and methicillin-sensitive forms) {47 (20.2%)}, Klebsiella spp {29 (12.5%)}, Enterococcus spp {15 (6.4%)}, Proteus spp {12 (5.1%)}, Streptococcus spp {6 (2.6%)}, Citrobacter spp {6 (2.6%)}, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa {4 (1.7%)}. The aetiological agents occurring least in the present study were Enterobacter spp. {3 (1.3%)}, Acinetobacter {2 (0.9%)}, and one case each {1 (0.4%)} of Morganella morganii, Staphylococcus saprophyticus, and Candida albicans (Table/Fig 2).

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test (AST) for the isolated species showed that Amikacin and Piperacillin-Tazobactam were the most effective drugs, followed by Gentamicin, Ciprofloxacin, Cotrimoxazole, Ceftriaxone, and Ampicillin. E. coli, the most common pathogen identified, showed the highest susceptibility to Amikacin and the highest resistance to Ampicillin. Staphylococcus aureus, the second most common organism isolated, showed the highest susceptibility to Piperacillin-Tazobactam, Ciprofloxacin, and the highest resistance to Cotrimoxazole (Table/Fig 3).

In the present study, most cases of UTI were seen during the monsoon season {117 (50.2%)} and winter {66 (28.3%)}, while the least were in the summer {50 (21.5%)} season. The authors studied the general trend of susceptibility of E. coli cultured from urinary samples to Ampicillin and Cotrimoxazole (oral first-line antibiotics included in this study, which are commonly prescribed in the outpatient setting) over a 6-year period from 2016 to 2021 and found a marked increase in the resistance of E. coli to both. This is a cause for concern in the local context and warrants continuous microbiological monitoring of urinary samples to help guide paediatricians towards better antibiotic prescribing practices (Table/Fig 4).

Discussion

Available literature shows that about 80% of uncomplicated UTIs are caused by Escherichia coli, and additional causative organisms include Staphylococcus saprophyticus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Proteus spp, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterococcus spp. Complicated or nosocomial infections are caused by organisms such as E. coli, Proteus spp., K. pneumoniae, Enterobacter spp., P. aeruginosa, Staphylococcus, and Enterococcus (5). The present study identified E. coli as the most common organism isolated from the urinary cultures obtained, which is in tandem with the observations made by previous authors (6),(7).

A female predominance was observed in this study, which is similar to the findings in previous studies by Ramgopal G and Shaji S et al., (2),(5). Even though anaerobes are thought to play a pathogenic role in UTI, the authors did not isolate them from any of our samples as the focus was more on aerobic culture. The large variability in their isolation rates among different studies may be due to differences in sampling and processing techniques, prior use of antibiotics, and differences in the timing of sampling during the course of the disease (11).

Antibiotic resistance has become a major clinical problem worldwide and has been increasing over the years (9). In the present study, the most common organism causing UTI was found to be E. coli, which showed maximum susceptibility to Amikacin and maximum resistance to Ampicillin. This was similar to the findings in previous studies by Patwardhan V et al., and Shailaja TS and Mohankumar A (4),(6). Additionally, nearly half of the isolates of E. coli were resistant to fluoroquinolones, while more than half were resistant to cephalosporins. This is very worrisome, as these groups of antibiotics are used extensively in the treatment for UTI (though fluoroquinolones are not generally used in the paediatric population). This was similar to the findings by Patwardhan V et al., and Jitendranath A et al., (4),(9).

Seasonal infectious diseases have been variously attributed to changes in various atmospheric conditions and the behaviour of the host. No previous study has evaluated the relation between seasonal changes and the bacteriology of UTI in Kerala. In this study, most cases of UTI were seen during the monsoon (149, 45.8%) and winter (106, 32.6%) seasons, while the least were in the summer (70, 21.5%) season.

The authors searched for similar studies in the English literature from Kerala, India, and found only four studies, one each from the districts of Kasargod (Northern Kerala) by Shaji S et al., Ernakulam (western Kerala) by Shailaja TS and Mohankumar A and Palakkad (Eastern Kerala) by Kallyadan VN (5),(6),(7). The present study was conducted in Idukki district, which is situated in the central part of Kerala. The populations included in these studies consisted of paediatric patients alone (Kasargod and Ernakulam) and both (Palakkad). All four studies showed E. coli as the most common organism causing UTI, with maximum sensitivity to Imipenem and Nitrofurantoin in the study conducted in Kasaragod, Meropenem in the study conducted in Ernakulam, and Amikacin in the study conducted in Palakkad and Idukki. On the other hand, maximum resistance was found to Ampicillin and Amoxicillin in the study conducted in Kasaragod, Ampicillin/Sulbactam and Cefixime in the study conducted in Ernakulam, and Ampicillin in the study conducted in Palakkad and Idukki (Table/Fig 5).

The authors in the present study also searched for similar studies in the English literature from other parts of India over the period of 2019-2023 and found five studies (14),(15),(16),(17),(18). The studies were from West Bengal, Odisha, Jammu and Kashmir, Haryana, Tamil Nadu, and Delhi. The study from West Bengal by Chakraborty M et al., was conducted over a period of 10 months among paediatric ICU patients and obtained 18 positive cultures, with maximum sensitivity towards Carbapenems and Amikacin and maximum resistance to Cephalosporins, with the most common organism isolated being Klebsiella (14). Whereas, the study from Odisha by Acharya NC et al., was conducted over a year among children less than 13 years of age, showing 186 positive cultures having maximum sensitivity towards Nitrofurantoin (16). The study from Jammu and Kashmir by Kawoosa K et al., was conducted among children less than 3 years of age over a year with 216 positive cultures showing maximum sensitivity towards Amikacin and Nitrofurantoin (17). The study from Haryana by Gupta MS et al., was also conducted over a year among children less than 5 years, with 200 positive cultures with the maximum sensitivity towards Piperacillin/Tazobactam (18).

On the other hand, a study from Delhi by Perween N et al., was carried out among the age group of 6 months to 18 years over 2 years and obtained 614 positive cultures, showing maximum sensitivity towards Colistin, Nitrofurantoin, and Amikacin, and maximum resistance to Ampicillin (15). Lastly, the study from Tamil Nadu by Typhena C et al., was conducted over five years and involved children less than 15 years of age, obtaining 331 positive cultures with maximum sensitivity towards Nitrofurantoin and Cefpodoxime, and maximum resistance towards Co-trimoxazole (Table/Fig 6) (1),(14),(15),(16),(17),(18).

Seasonal variation in the occurrence of UTI was not discussed in any of the other studies conducted in Kerala. Hence, we could not compare it with our study, which showed the maximum cases in the monsoon season {149 (45.8%)} and the minimum in the summer season {70 (21.5%)}. A study from Belgium by Boon HA et al., regarding incidence rates and trends of childhood UTIs found that, apart from gender and age considerations, the rates of cystitis tracked a distinct pattern of seasonality (p<0.001), with the period from June to August showing a slight decrease in incidence (19). Similarly, further studies in India to evaluate the importance of weather as an environmental factor favouring the occurrence of UTIs would help guide clinicians to have a high degree of clinical suspicion when evaluating these patients during those particular seasons.

Limitation(s)

The limitations of the study are that the study was restricted to a single center, only including patients visiting the hospital, and the UTI in the community was not well-assessed. There was non-uniformity in collecting urine samples and a lack of data on clinical response and outcomes. As this study focused on the burden of antimicrobial resistance, the clinical presentations have not been described.

Conclusion

The results of this study suggest that it would be wise for paediatricians in Idukki district to refrain from using Ampicillin empirically to treat cases suspected to have UTI. Also, more and more strains of common uropathogens are becoming resistant to commonly used urinary antibiotics like cotrimoxazole, cephalosporins, and fluoroquinolones. This translates to increased use of higher antibiotics and consequent cost to the patient, as well as increased morbidity to the patient and consumption of healthcare resources, which may be put to better use in the community. Preventive measures should be advised to all patients, with an emphasis on urinary hygiene in the monsoon and winter seasons. Therefore, it is imperative to tailor the treatment of patients with UTI based on culture and sensitivity reports in order to optimise the therapy and reduce treatment failures and their sequelae.

Acknowledgement

We would like to acknowledge all the help received for this work by the Department of Microbiology, Al Azhar Medical College and Super Specialty Hospital, Ezhalloor, Thodupuzha, India.

References

1.
Typhena C, Sahni RD, John S, Jeyapaul S, George A, Helan J. A retrospective study on the microbial spectrum and antibiogram of uropathogens in children in a secondary care hospital in Rural Vellore, South India. J Family Med Prim Care. 2021;10(4):1706-11. Doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_2090_20. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Ramagopal G. Clinical and microbiological profile of children with urinary tract infection. J Ped. Nephrology 2018;6(2):01-05. https://doi.org/10.22037/jpn.v6i2.21010.
3.
Sheriff R, Johnson J, Prasobh KK, Sarayu L. Urinary Esch coli isolates in tertiary care centre of south Kerala: Antibiogram and ESBL detection by phenotypic confirmatory disc diffusion testing. Int J Med Microbiol Trop Dis. 2018;4(4):222-25. Doi: 10.18231/2581-4761.2018.0048. [crossref]
4.
Patwardhan V, Kumar D, Goel V, Singh S. Changing prevalence and antibiotic drug resistance pattern of pathogens seen in community acquired paediatric urinary tract infections at a tertiary care hospital of North India. J Lab Physicians. 2017;9(4):264-68. Doi: 10.4103/JLP.JLP_149_16. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Shaji S, Vinayakumar ST, Shaji S. A study on antibiotic sensitivity pattern in children hospitalized for urin ary tract infection in a tertiary care hospital in South India. Ind J Pharm Prac. 2021;14(3):174-79. Doi: 10.5530/ijopp.14.3.35. [crossref]
6.
Shailaja TS, Mohankumar A. Bacteriological profile of urinary tract infection in a tertiary care centre. Indian J Microbiol Res. 2017;4(3):328-32. Doi: 10.18231/2394-5478.2017.0072.
7.
Kallyadan VN, Shetty AV, Shenoy DR, Shenoy MV, Avinash SK. Antimicrobial susceptibility, risk factors and prevalence of bla cefotaximase, temoneira, and sulfhydryl variable genes among Escheria coli in community-acquired paediatric urinary tract infection. J Lab Physicians. 2017;9(3):156-62. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Indian Society of Paediatric Nephrology, Vijaykuma M, Kanitkar M, Nammalwar BR, Bagga A. Revised statement on management of urinary tract infections. Indian Paediatrics. 2011;48(9):709-17.
9.
Jitendranath A, Radhika R, Bhargavi L. Microbiological profile of urinary tract infection in paediatric population from a tertiary care hospital in South Kerala. J Bacteriol Mycol Open Access. 2015;1(1):04-07. Doi: 10.15406/jbmoa.2015.01.00002. [crossref]
10.
Kalal BS, Patel RB. Microbiological and antimicrobial profile of urinary tract infection in children from a teaching hospital in south India. J Paediatr Inf. 2017;11(1):i19-i22. Doi: 10.5578/ced.50691. [crossref]
11.
Nisha KV, Veena SA, Rathika SD, Vijaya SM, Avinash SK. Antimicrobial susceptibility, risk factors and prevalence of bla cefotaximase, temoneira, and sulfhydryl variable genes among Escherichia coli in community-acquired paediatric urinary tract infection. J Lab Physicians. 2017;9(3):156-62. Doi: 10.4103/0974-2727.208262. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Akram M, Shahid M, Khan AU. Etiology and antibiotic resistance patterns of community-acquired urinary tract infections in J N M C Hospital Aligarh, India. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2007;6:4. Doi: 10.1186/1476-0711-6-4. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Annual Report 2022. India Meteorological Department (Ministry of Earth Sciences) [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2023 Apr 15]. Available from: https://mausam.imd.gov.in/ imd_latest/contents/ar2022.pdf.
14.
Chakraborty M, Sardar S, De R, Biswas M, Mascellino MT, Miele MC, et al. Current trends in antimicrobial resistance patterns in bacterial pathogens among adult and paediatric patients in the intensive care unit in a tertiary care hospital in Kolkata, India. Antibiotics (Basel). 2023;12(3):459. https://doi.org/10.3390/ antibiotics12030459. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Perween N, Rai S, Nandwani S. Retrospective analysis of urinary tract infection in the paediatric population at a tertiary care centre. Cureus. 2022;14(5):e24796. Doi: 10.7759/cureus.24796. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Acharya NC, Sahoo S, Routray SP, Mohanty JN. Urinary tract infection profile in paediatric patients: A clinicobacteriological and radiological analysis. Annals of RSCB. 2021;14406-10. Available from: https://annalsofrscb.ro/index.php/ journal/article/view/4622.
17.
Kawoosa K, Malla RR, Dar SA, Kubravi SH. Clinical profile of paediatric patients with urinary tract infection in a tertiary care centre in Kashmir, India. Int J Contemp Paediatr. 2019;6(3):1149-53. [crossref]
18.
Gupta MS, Yadav V, Singh G. Clinical and microbiological study of urinary tract infection in children under five years of age. Indian J Basic Appl Med Res. 2019;9-1:95-102.
19.
Boon HA, Struyf T, Crevecoeur J, Delvaux N, Pottelbergh GV, Vaes B, et al. Incidence rates and trends of childhood urinary tract infections and antibiotic prescribing: Registry-based study in general practices (2000 to 2020). BMC Prim Care. 2022;23(1):177. Doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01784-x.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2024/64216.19034

Date of Submission: Mar 27, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Jul 24, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Dec 12, 2023
Date of Publishing: Feb 01, 2024

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Mar 29, 2023
• Manual Googling: Jul 29, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Dec 09, 2023 (11%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 8

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com